# Futurum Signal > Continuous, forward-looking vendor scoring across five analyst-weighted areas, refreshed when a market moves rather than once a year. - Canonical: https://trial.futurumgroup.com/products/signal/ - Published: 2026-09-09 Futurum Signal A vendor evaluation that refreshes when the market moves, not when the calendar does. In one sentence Futurum Signal is a continuously updated vendor evaluation that scores technology vendors across five analyst-weighted assessment areas, refreshing when a market does something substantive rather than on an annual publishing cycle. The short version Type: Subscription · continuous, refreshes on market events Method: Hybrid — agentic AI for scale, Futurum analysts for the framework and the final word Grounded on: Futurum’s research corpus, ETR and G2, plus public and partner sources, via GraphRAG Guardrails: Sovereign context graph upstream; an adversarial fact-checking courtroom downstream Markets scored: Fourteen and counting, from AI accelerators to ERP platforms Scale: 1,000+ vendors carrying a current position and a six-to-twelve-month forecast Typically read by: Technology vendors, enterprise buyers, investors A quadrant is a photograph of a room everyone has already left. Technology markets move in weeks. Most vendor evaluation models still rely on snapshots that can lag six to twelve months. Futurum Signal closes that gap: a continuously updated, data-driven view of vendor performance and market readiness scored across five analyst-weighted assessment areas and refreshed as the market moves. The output is forward-looking — where a vendor is heading, not only where it has been — and it is produced without asking vendors to fill in a survey or submit through a gate. Human expertise, machine scale, and a courtroom in between Signal is a hybrid method. Agents do the scanning and the drafting. Futurum analysts define the market and hold editorial control. In between sit two guardrails aimed at one specific failure mode — a fluent, confident sentence about the wrong vendor. Five weighted areas, and the direction of travel. Weightings are set per market by the analyst who owns it. A composite score is useful; the sub-scores are where an argument actually happens. The five assessment areas: Strategic Vision; Go-to-market Execution; Ecosystem Alignment; Product Innovation & Solution Capabilities; Business Values Index. Three audiences, three different reasons Technology vendors. You have been scored by a firm that never spoke to you, and the next window to correct it is eleven months away. A transparent, repeatable view of how you compare to peers, with no long survey and no gated submission. Enterprise buyers. The evaluation on your desk was published before the product you are being sold existed. A dynamic complement to existing analyst reports that reflects the market’s actual trajectory during a live decision. Investors. By the time a category shift reaches a research print cycle, it is in the share price. Early detection of movers and laggards, and aggregate signal on where a market is inflecting. Frequently asked What is Futurum Signal? Futurum Signal is a continuously updated vendor evaluation model. It scores technology vendors on their performance and market readiness across five analyst-weighted assessment areas, and refreshes when a market moves rather than on an annual cycle. It combines an agentic AI workflow for scanning and synthesis with a Futurum analyst framework and human editorial control. How is Signal different from a magic quadrant or a wave? Three ways. It is continuous — it re-scores on substantive market events instead of once a year. It is forward-looking — it reads the five assessment areas as leading indicators rather than reporting a past position. And it requires no vendor submission — there is no long questionnaire or gated briefing process, so inclusion does not depend on a vendor’s willingness to participate. If AI drafts it, how do you stop it hallucinating? With two guardrails on opposite sides of the drafting step. Upstream, a sovereign context graph — a deterministic local graph of established vendor products, capabilities and axioms — is queried before any semantic search, which anchors every agent inside absolute vendor boundaries and prevents cross-vendor conflation. Downstream, an adversarial fact-checking courtroom audits every drafted finding line by line: a prose prosecutor challenges qualitative claims, a grounding researcher verifies data points against live sources, and a policy judge applies edits. Only then does a Futurum analyst review it. What data sources does Signal use? A curated corpus of proprietary Futurum research, accessed through GraphRAG, plus ETR (a Futurum company) and G2 partner data, plus public sources. The combination of confidential and public inputs is what closes the visibility gap that public-only analysis leaves open. Do vendors pay to be included or to influence their score? Inclusion is set by analyst-defined criteria for each market, not by participation. Vendors and clients can request briefings to understand a score and surface context, and the framework, weightings and assessment areas are published so a score can be interrogated. How often does a Signal score change? On demand, when a market shift warrants it — an acquisition, a launch that changes a category boundary, a go-to-market change — rather than on a fixed calendar. That is the design intent: a market that moves in weeks should not be evaluated in years. Pairs well with Futurum Intelligence Platform: The full dataset behind the research: market sizing, five-year forecasts, buyer survey data and AI synthesis. Filter it, chart it, export it. Labs, Testing & Validation: Signal65 puts the product on the bench and publishes what it measured. Third-party proof for a performance claim you need buyers to believe.