CHIPS Act Delay Creates a Snowball for US Based Chip Manufacturing
Futurum principal analyst Daniel Newman discusses how Congress coming to an impasse with the proposed CHIPS Act may set Intel back nearly $100 billion as the development of their new U.S.-based semiconductor manufacturer could come to a pause.
Cite this

The News: A large chip factory currently in the early stages of being built outside of Columbus, Ohio, could see its scope scaled back or construction delayed depending on what Congress does with the CHIPS Act, Intel said in a statement on Thursday.
The facility was announced in January and would be the most significant expansion of U.S.-based semiconductor manufacturing in years. Intel estimated the plant could cost as much as $100 billion and committed an initial investment of $20 billion.
CHIPS Act Delay Creates a Snowball for US Based Chip Manufacturing
Analyst Take: As the world continues to struggle with massive supply chain shortages that contributed to our out-of-control inflation and massive shortages in automobiles, PCs, smartphones, and countless other technologically enhanced products and goods, the U.S. struggles to move forward with the $52 billion CHIPS Act.
Intel has been aggressively committing investments, including its up to $100 billion mega fab to help bring resiliency to the semiconductor supply chain while also executing its multi-year strategy to innovate its manufacturing, design, and fabrication business—something that not only America needs, but the world sorely needs. However, the aggressive commitments made by Intel were done under the onus that the U.S. government would pass the Chips Act and make a number of contributions through grants and tax incentives. At this point, without those incentives, Intel is in a situation where it must pause until policymakers pass the legislation and/or provide greater clarity as to what is ahead.
While much attention right now is focused on the stifling high inflation and the implications of the war in Ukraine and Russia, which is further damaging supply chains and driving oil and gas prices through the roof, there has been a bit of a lax response to the massive damage that has been caused by our fragile supply chain—especially for semiconductors.
And the risks of our continued inaction are becoming increasingly disconcerting—be it the national security risks of losing ground as the world’s semiconductor innovation leader, or the risks of not being able to manufacture enough chips in the event of an attack on Taiwan or other nations where we have grown dependent for semiconductor production.
For perspective, the current semiconductor manufacturing landscape looks as follows:
Tooling:
China volume going up 5-10%
Volume going everywhere else going down
Planned Projects:
China 40
Taiwan 20
US 5
It is easy to see that the US is in a critical moment where investment in the manufacturing and advancement of US chip development should be an imperative. The inaction of our policymakers is reaching an impasse and demonstrates a level of incapacity or incompetency that is borderline criminal. Our dependence on Taiwan has stretched beyond what is reasonable, especially given the delicate state of Taiwan’s relations with China. It’s time for us to not only pass this act, but think much bigger about the national security implications, and the importance of being the world’s leader in technology and semiconductor development.
Disclosure: Futurum Research is a research and advisory firm that engages or has engaged in research, analysis, and advisory services with many technology companies, including those mentioned in this article. The author does not hold any equity positions with any company mentioned in this article.
Analysis and opinions expressed herein are specific to the analyst individually and data and other information that might have been provided for validation, not those of Futurum Research as a whole.
Other insights from Futurum Research:
Intel Announces Plan to Build Chip Manufacturing Complex in Ohio
Intel Delays “Sapphire Rapids” CPU Chips
Intel Axes Nervana AI Chips Making Habana The Path Forward
Image Credit: Mint
Subscribe to The Weekly
The week's market signals, one email, no filler. Unsubscribe any time.
More from Daniel Newman
The Foundry Bet: IonQ, SkyWater, and the Industrialization of Quantum
Futurum’s Daniel Newman shares his insights on why quantum’s next phase is an industrialization race, why the SkyWater acquisition puts IonQ in the top echelon, and why the bet still has to be proven.
The Token Cost Reckoning Arrives in the CFO’s Office
In our latest thought leadership brief, The Token Cost Reckoning Arrives in the CFO’s Office, completed in partnership with Google Cloud, Futurum Research examines how enterprises can track cost per successful agent run and cut token spend before their next budget review.
AI Decision Intelligence: The Category That Replaces Legacy Research
Futurum CEO, Daniel Newman, shares that Futurum Forward is the first platform purpose-built for the AI enterprise cycle. Replacing legacy research, it combines a proprietary data spine with a productized operator model for real-time intelligence.