The 5G C Band Debacle
The Six Five team talks about the 5G C band debacle. Watch the clip here: If you are interested in watching the full episode you can check it out here. Disclaimer: The Six Five Webcast is for information and entertainment purposes only.
Cite this

The Six Five team talks about the 5G C band debacle.
Watch the clip here:
If you are interested in watching the full episode you can check it out here.
Disclaimer: The Six Five Webcast is for information and entertainment purposes only. Over the course of this webcast, we may talk about companies that are publicly traded and we may even reference that fact and their equity share price, but please do not take anything that we say as a recommendation about what you should do with your investment dollars. We are not investment advisors and we do not ask that you treat us as such.
Transcript:
Daniel Newman: We’ve got to keep moving. Speaking of big, crazy connectivity news, 5G C-band debacle. What a freaking disaster. Okay. I’m sorry. I’m going to just review what I’ve tweeted about this thing.
A, did we not know the C-band was coming for how long? Okay, was this a first we heard of it? Second of all, did we not do any research during the process of deploying these antennas in this infrastructure for this C-band deployment? Did we not consider the possible interference because of near band overlap or crossover interference that could mess with instruments in various different things like, I don’t know, jumbo jets at massive air fields all over the United States?
Pat, honestly, I am freaking puzzle as to how we could be so uncoordinated here between, say, the FAA, between the FCC, between the airlines, the service providers and carriers that are deploying this thing, that it’s like, “Oh my God. We’re going to turn them on this week. We might want to think about whether there’s an interference issue.” I mean, couldn’t they set some of this stuff up around some of this equipment and say, “Hey, what happened? Let’s test out what potential risks are. We’ll have someone standing by. If there’s any interference, we could shut it down instantly to make sure that everybody’s safe. We will not expose passengers and the public to this thing.”
And then, it brings me back to… You remember all these days of having to turn off our phones and then having to put a… And then eventually got to the point where it’s like… I don’t even know why they make the announcement anymore. Nobody puts their phones in airplane mode. They don’t check it. And if it was really a risk of causing some sort of instrumentation issue, it wouldn’t just be like, “Please turn them off.” It would be a like, “Put your phones in this steel bucket until we’ve taken off and then you can come reclaim them.” It’s insane. It’s actually insane.
And so, here’s a couple other things that are on my mind. One is, it’s amazing how nobody’s willing to say anything. You pointed out that Neville Ray, one of the leaders at T-Mobile, talked about their specific tech, and I’ll leave that for you to talk about here. But I watched Hans go on CNBC. Wouldn’t talk about it. FCC wouldn’t talk about it. The FAA… Nobody has clarity. I said, “Where is the data on this thing? How in the world did we get this far and not have published data on the quality, the risks, the interference of this band?”
And then, of course you sold this band. SCC sold this band for billions of dollars. And now they’re going to tell these companies that maybe they can’t use it in 50 major markets pending an investigation that you’re waiting till now to do. All right. My head’s going to freaking explode. The word I want to use with the F, Pat, by the way, I can’t use because we’d get one of those censorships on our show. I don’t want to have a censorship. But I’m F-ing mind blown by the fact that we seem so disorganized here. By the way, we’re like a weekend and it seems like everyone’s flying again.
Patrick Moorhead: Gosh, Daniel, why are you so upset? The FAA budget’s only $17.5 billion. I mean, you’d expect them to squeak by with that amount of money and figure this out. I mean, I don’t know what you would expect. No, no, I am completely disgusted with the FAA for letting this… I’m less disgusted with the FCC, but hey, we’re one big happy family. We get taxed more than we should and we should demand that things like this get addressed.
I’ve got to tell you, I don’t know what Buttigieg is doing, or where he was spending his time, or what he was thinking. This is in his camp. The one thing I will point out is… And I think that T-Mobile deserves a victory lap. They deserve a victory lap because their mid band doesn’t conflict with any of this. I give them credit for having the foresight for acquiring Sprint that had that spectrum. Neville Ray came out, and I was glad he did.
Essentially, he said, “Hey, we use 600 megahertz, 2.5 gigahertz, not the 3.7 to 4.2 that the FAA is concerned about. He also threw AT&T and Verizon under the bus, saying that that this is their issue. So I’ll give them a little bit of a victory lap on the foresight here. Maybe it was luck. Maybe it was sheer brilliance. It doesn’t matter. But mid band, T-Mobile, put it all around the airports. Not an issue.
Daniel Newman: Seems like a good idea, although I sometimes do wish my T-Mobile was a little faster. I am a T-Mobile user, full disclosure, and T-Mobile’s a customer, full disclosure. So I just want to say all that. But I am a pretty big time user. I do want to see everything get faster because, well, I like it fast. Pat, last topic. Exciting, by the way. Sorry, if I sounded pouty about all that 5G stuff. I just can’t believe we can’t find anyone to give us any good insights on this. You had to come to the Six Five to get the good insights. The good-
Patrick Moorhead: Listen, I think, if I can pat them on the back, I think they’ve done the best coverage data of anybody maybe. Sascha Segan from PCMag has done a pretty good job. But I’m outraged, especially with the tax. I think I spent most of my Christmas holiday working on tax stuff. This is our tax dollars at work. I want a rational explanation, other than dereliction of duty. I mean, Buttigieg needs to explain himself.
Subscribe to The Weekly
The week's market signals, one email, no filler. Unsubscribe any time.
More from Daniel Newman
The Foundry Bet: IonQ, SkyWater, and the Industrialization of Quantum
Futurum’s Daniel Newman shares his insights on why quantum’s next phase is an industrialization race, why the SkyWater acquisition puts IonQ in the top echelon, and why the bet still has to be proven.
The Token Cost Reckoning Arrives in the CFO’s Office
In our latest thought leadership brief, The Token Cost Reckoning Arrives in the CFO’s Office, completed in partnership with Google Cloud, Futurum Research examines how enterprises can track cost per successful agent run and cut token spend before their next budget review.
AI Decision Intelligence: The Category That Replaces Legacy Research
Futurum CEO, Daniel Newman, shares that Futurum Forward is the first platform purpose-built for the AI enterprise cycle. Replacing legacy research, it combines a proprietary data spine with a productized operator model for real-time intelligence.